Monochrome Mashups: Hillier, Ernst and Mad Meg

An Ending by Dan Hillier.

JJ Beetle by Dan Hillier

Beetle by Dan Hillier

 

Though an accomplished painter and illustrator of original works, Dan Hillier has become well-known for his inventive collages sourced from Dover Pictorial Archives, with a dose of Photoshoppery.  His Lovecraftian combinations of prim ladies and writhing tentacles has even inspired people to permanently emblazon his work on their person.

But I have shown you his work to talk about another artist entirely. Hillier’s antler-headed and octopus-tentacled creations continue a style of “artistic alchemy” that was made famous by Max Ernst and other Surrealists. Before Photoshop and scanned images, collages of this nature were made painstakingly by hand, using illustrations from penny-novels.

from A week of kindness by Max Ernst

“One day (in 1919), whereas I looked at an illustrated book of objects (umbrellas, watches, tools, clothing, etc) I was surprised to see such different things tight beside the others, things which one does not see together usually, my eyes saw other objects, I wanted to add with the pencil some lines and hatchings between the various objects so that it gives the same images that I see in my dreams.” –Max Ernst.

Ernst’s A Week of Kindness (Une semaine de bonté) published in 1934, was filled with prim and proper Victorian lords and ladies doing properly horrible things while sporting the heads of beasts and birds. The bird eventually become his alter ego, (named Loplop), and was to be found throughout his artworks.

ax Ernst

from A week of kindness by Max Ernst

from A week of kindness by Max Ernst

Max Ernst

from A week of kindness by Max Ernst

What makes Max Ernst’s monochromatic collages so enduring and unsettling is their coherence. Not only are all the source-works of a similar style, they are positioned in a way that makes visual and narrative sense. The engravings and etchings are also uniformly from earnest scientific, historical or literary depictions, their seriousness adding to the humor and horror prevalent in each collection. The head positions and scales of the animal-heads match nearly seamlessly, helped by some additional cross-hatching and inkwork. Ernst also deliberately chose banal images, staying away from immediately recognizable works by artists such as Gustave Doré.

Another more narrative art-book series was entitled A little girl dreams of taking the veil (Rêve d’une petite fille qui voulut entrer au Carmel ) Has some bits of entomology throughout:

“who am i? i myself, my sister or this obscure beetle?” (embarrassment.) by Max Ernst

“...Upsy-daisy! Upsy-daisy!...” from A little girl dreams of taking the veil by Max Ernst

But I have shown you his work to talk about another artist entirely. While searching randomly for “insect-headed” artworks, I came upon what appeared to be another photoshop collection, or possibly very clever collages, of men with the heads of insects:

La leçon de pornographie (detail) by Mad Meg

La leçon de pornographie (detail) by Mad Meg

Except it is neither. “Mad Meg” Margot (the art-allusionary alias of a contemporary French artist and illustrator with very little bio information) creates immense hand-drawn tableaux of generic wealthy gentlemen wearing the heads of insects, often using gestures and motifs, and styles found in works of the 15th century masters. Her site is huge, voluminous, and full of elaborate re-inventions of famous Flemish works. It is also full of animals, comics, and insects, glorious insects! Especially striking are the invert-headed gentlemen found throughout:

La leçon de pornographie by Mad Meg

This work in particular is based on Rembrandt’s 1632 work La leçon d’anatomie du docteur Tulp. The line up here is Butterfly, Mantis, Carabid Beetle, Wasp, Weevil, Caterpillar, Locust and Amblypygi (aka tailless whip scorpion).

Patriarche No. 32 by Mad Meg

Patriarche No. 32 by Mad Meg

Cockchafer-headed gentlemen from the Patriarches series

Feast of fools (detail) by Mad Meg

Feast of fools” is a gigantic ongoing work in which the Last Supper (or something very much like it) is not only populated with insect-headed businessmen, but every place setting is based on still-life paintings and photographs from Caravaggio to Joel Peter Witkin.

Instead of pillaging readymade scientific illustrations to create commentary,  Mad Meg’s work is a hand-drawn collage of scientific and fine artworks, their origins merged through her use of a monochrome palette and uniform style.  Miniscule invertebrate heads are placed seamlessly on towering human bodies, giving well-to-do men of the world an otherworldly horror, their base motives laid bare on their countenances. Like Ernst’s lion and vulture-men, some insects have an allegorical context (locusts, wasps and flies for example). However the use of obscure invertebrates always makes me wonder: What does an Amblypygi head signify to the general public? Will greater knowledge of obscure invertebrates create new allegories beyond the simply grotesque?  I’d like to hope someday that would be the case.

 

This entry was posted in art and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *